Rafiq Ask Rafiq

Is playing chess haram?

The strongest position among the scholars is that playing chess is not permitted, and this is what the Hanbali school holds, along with Abu Hanifah and Malik. Ibn Qudamah states it plainly in al-Mughni: chess is like backgammon in prohibition, though backgammon is more emphatically forbidden because an explicit text forbids it. The Permanent Committee ruled without qualification: "It is not permissible to play chess for any purpose whatsoever."

Why the scholars prohibit it

The prohibition does not rest on a hadith of the Prophet ﷺ about chess specifically. Shaykh al-Abbad notes that no narration from the Messenger ﷺ on chess is known. Instead the scholars reasoned from what chess does, and from the statements of the Companions.

Ibn Qudamah gives the argument in al-Mughni: chess is a game that diverts from the remembrance of Allah and from prayer, so it resembles backgammon, which is forbidden by explicit text. He cites the verse:

"O you who have believed, indeed intoxicants, gambling, sacrificing on stone altars, and divining arrows are but defilement from the work of Satan, so avoid it."— Qur'an 5:90

And he records that Ali رضي الله عنه said, "Chess is from gambling," and that when he passed by people bent over a chessboard he said, "What are these images to which you are devoted?" Ahmad said the strongest thing transmitted about chess is the statement of Ali.

The scholars also note the practical harm: the game absorbs the mind so completely that a player loses awareness of hunger, of greetings, of his family — and so of his Lord.

What the Companions and Successors held

Ibn Qudamah lists those who held chess forbidden: Ali ibn Abi Talib, Ibn Umar, Ibn Abbas, Sa'id ibn al-Musayyib, al-Qasim, Salim, Urwah, Muhammad ibn Ali ibn al-Husayn, Matar al-Warraq, and Malik. Ibn Umar's word was that it is "worse than backgammon." Malik said it is worse than backgammon and more diverting from good.

The view that permits it

Imam al-Shafi'i held chess disliked but not forbidden, and this is reported from a group of the Successors. His students argued that the default in things is permissiveness, that no text forbids chess, and that it differs from backgammon in two ways: chess involves the planning of war, and its outcome rests on skill rather than on the throw of dice.

Ibn Qudamah answers both points. The intention of players is not war-planning but play or gambling; and the very fact that chess depends on the player's own calculation makes it more absorbing, and therefore more diverting from Allah's remembrance and prayer, not less.

The conditions some scholars attach

Shaykh al-Albani took a middle path: since no authentic text forbids chess, it may be played occasionally for relaxation, under conditions.

  • The pieces must be altered: chess pieces include carved figures — the king, the horse, the elephant — and these must be defaced or changed before play.
  • It must not become a habit: played occasionally, not as a regular occupation.
  • It must not divert from obligations: not from prayer, the mosque, or duties to family and work.

He adds that if a player reaches the point where chess diverts him from Allah's remembrance, it becomes like intoxicants. He also notes that Ibn Taymiyyah and others held it forbidden outright.

Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen, asked about chess, focused on the pieces: told they are asnam (idols), he said they are not permissible, though children are excused since they are not yet accountable.

The positions side by side

PositionHeld byBasis
Forbidden outrightHanbalis, Abu Hanifah, Malik, Ibn Taymiyyah, Permanent Committee, Ibn BazDiverts from Allah and prayer; Companion statements
Disliked, not forbiddenal-Shafi'i and his studentsNo text; default is permissibility
Permitted occasionally with conditionsal-AlbaniNo authentic text; conditions remove the harm

Ibn Baz ruled that playing cards, chess and similar games are forbidden because they are instruments of idle play that divert from Allah's remembrance and prayer, waste time, and may breed enmity — and if money is staked, the prohibition is stronger still, as it becomes gambling.

In practice

If you follow the Hanbali position, chess is to be left. If you follow the view that permits it occasionally, the conditions are not decorative: the pieces must be free of carved figures, the game must not become a habit, and it must not cost you a prayer, a duty, or the remembrance of Allah. The disagreement is real, and the scholars who prohibit it do so on reasoning they consider decisive.

Key takeaways

  • The Hanbali school, Abu Hanifah and Malik hold chess forbidden; al-Shafi'i held it disliked but not forbidden.
  • No authentic hadith from the Prophet ﷺ forbids chess specifically; the prohibition rests on reasoning from its effects and on Companion statements.
  • The Permanent Committee and Ibn Baz prohibited it without qualification, and more severely if money is staked.
  • Al-Albani permitted occasional play if the carved figures are removed and it does not become a habit or divert from obligations.
  • If it causes you to miss prayer or neglect a duty, all scholars agree it is forbidden in that case.

Further reading

  • Ibn Qudamah, al-Mughni
  • Ibn Taymiyyah, as cited in IslamWeb (fatwa 442309)
  • Shaykh al-Albani, Jami' Turath al-Albani fi al-Fiqh

And Allah knows best.

Answered by Rafiq AI from the Qur'an, the hadith and the works of the scholars ·

This is a guide to what the scholars have said, not a fatwa. For your own situation, ask a qualified scholar who can hear the details.

Have a question of your own?

Ask Rafiq — it's free