The scholars are agreed that a Muslim who abandons the prayer while denying it is obligatory has left Islam. Where he abandons it out of laziness while still believing it is required, the scholars differ: the Hanbali position, held by Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen, is that he is a disbeliever outside the fold of Islam, while the majority of the four schools — and al-Albani — hold that he is a grave sinner who remains a Muslim.
The two cases scholars distinguish
Every ruling on this question turns on a single distinction, and the scholars state it before anything else.
- Denial of the obligation: a sane, accountable person who holds that the prayer is not required of him has rejected Allah and His Messenger. Ibn Baz says this is unbelief by the consensus of the scholars — the same as one who denies the obligation of zakah, fasting, or Hajj, or who declares adultery or wine lawful.
- Abandonment through laziness: he knows the prayer is obligatory and believes in it, but does not perform it. Here the scholars genuinely differ, and this is where the question becomes contested.
Al-Albani, who held with the majority that the lazy abandoner remains a Muslim, explains the texts by the same line, noting that the hadith "he has disbelieved" carries two meanings: for the one who rejects the prayer's legislation it means outright apostasy, while for the one who affirms it but neglects it, it means he has come close to disbelief and is in grave danger of dying upon it.
Why the Hanbali position holds it to be major disbelief
The argument rests on the Qur'an, the Sunnah and the statements of the Companions.
The Qur'anic proof is the verse in Surah al-Tawbah:
"But if they repent, establish prayer and give zakah, then they are your brothers in religion"— Qur'an 9:11
Ibn Uthaymeen's reasoning is that brotherhood in faith is not severed by sin, however great — the believers who fight one another are still called brothers — but it is severed by leaving Islam. Since Allah made the establishment of prayer a condition of that brotherhood, its absence means the person is outside it.
From the Sunnah, the Prophet ﷺ said:
"Between a man and disbelief and polytheism is the abandoning of prayer"— Sahih Muslim 82, from Jabir ibn Abdullah
And in another narration:
"The covenant between us and them is the prayer; whoever abandons it has disbelieved"— narrated by Ahmad, al-Tirmidhi 2621, al-Nasa'i and Ibn Majah 1079, from Buraydah
Ibn Baz notes that when disbelief and polytheism are mentioned with the definite article, the intended meaning is the major form. He also cites the hadith of Abdullah ibn Amr that the one who does not guard the prayer will be gathered on the Day of Resurrection with Pharaoh, Haman, Qarun and Ubayy ibn Khalaf — and some scholars took this gathering with the leaders of disbelief as evidence that he has become one of them.
Ibn Uthaymeen adds the reasoning of the sound intellect: can a man with even a mustard seed of faith in his heart, who knows the greatness of the prayer and Allah's care for it, persist in abandoning it? He also records that Abdullah ibn Shaqiq said the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ did not consider the abandonment of any deed to be disbelief except the prayer.
The majority position
The majority of the four schools — the Malikis, Hanafis and Shafis, and a group of the Hanbalis as well — hold that the one who abandons the prayer out of laziness while affirming its obligation does not leave Islam. Ibn Baz states this plainly and then rejects it, saying the correct view is the first.
The Maliki position is set out in al-Tanbih: the well-known view in the school is that he is not a disbeliever, because one does not become a disbeliever through sins. Ibn Habib held him to be a disbeliever, but the author says the texts suggesting this can all be interpreted otherwise, and the decisive proof forcing that interpretation is the verse:
"Indeed, Allah does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills"— Qur'an 4:116
On this view he is commanded to pray within the time; if he refuses until the time is about to lapse, he is killed — but as a legal punishment, not as a disbeliever.
Ibn Uthaymeen answers this reasoning directly: abandoning the prayer is not "less than" polytheism, it is of it, because of the hadith "between a man and disbelief and polytheism is the abandoning of prayer." He examines the other texts cited by those who do not declare him a disbeliever and classifies them into five categories: those with no proof in them at all, those qualified by a description that makes abandoning the prayer impossible, those qualified by a circumstance in which the prayer is excused, those that are general and are specified by the hadiths on the disbelief of the one who abandons prayer, and those that are weak and cannot stand against the authentic narrations.
Abd al-Muhsin al-Abbad notes that those who hold he is not a disbeliever are numerous, both early and late, and are not to be called Murji'ah — since the Murji'ah hold that no sin harms faith at all, whereas these scholars hold he is deserving of punishment and in danger.
| Denies the obligation | Abandons out of laziness | |
|---|---|---|
| Hanbali / Ibn Baz, Ibn Uthaymeen | Disbeliever by consensus | Disbeliever, major disbelief |
| al-Albani | Disbeliever | Not a disbeliever; in grave danger |
| Maliki | Disbeliever | Not a disbeliever (well-known view) |
| Hanafi and Shafi'i | Disbeliever | Not a disbeliever |
What follows if he dies upon it
On the position that he is a disbeliever, Ibn Uthaymeen lists the consequences that follow from the ruling of apostasy:
- He is not washed, shrouded, prayed over, or buried among the Muslims. He is taken out to open ground, a hole is dug, and he is buried in his clothes.
- He does not inherit from his Muslim relatives, nor they from him — "the Muslim does not inherit from the disbeliever, nor the disbeliever from the Muslim."
- His slaughter is not eaten, and Ibn Uthaymeen notes this makes it worse than the slaughter of a Jew or Christian.
- He is not to be greeted with mercy or supplication for forgiveness after death.
- He is to be hated and disavowed, and it is obligatory to inform the imam if such a person is brought for the funeral prayer — Ibn Uthaymeen says this is sincere counsel, not backbiting.
- He is gathered on the Day of Resurrection with Pharaoh, Haman, Qarun and Ubayy ibn Khalaf.
Ibn Uthaymeen also notes that one who prays only in Ramadan, or only the Friday prayer, has not abandoned the prayer absolutely; the scholars differed over his ruling, and he says such a person appears to be trifling with the religion and is in great danger.
In practice
If you are asking about yourself, the door is open. Ibn Baz says that if a person abandons the prayer without denying its obligation, he must renew a sincere repentance. The prayer is the pillar of Islam, and the one who leaves it is in danger of dying upon disbelief.
If you are asking about someone else — a relative or a household member — Ibn Uthaymeen's instruction is to call them, to persist, and to repeat, in the hope that Allah guides them. He adds that one should not live with those who never pray, and that one should avoid the company of those who abandon it, since neglecting the prayer is a trait of the hypocrites.
Key takeaways
- Denying the prayer is obligatory is disbelief by consensus — this is not disputed by anyone.
- The Hanbali position is that abandoning it out of laziness is also major disbelief, held by Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen.
- The majority of the four schools, and al-Albani, hold he remains a Muslim and a grave sinner; Ibn Baz names this view and rejects it.
- The consequences are severe: no funeral prayer, no inheritance, no supplication for mercy, and gathering with the leaders of disbelief.
- Repentance is available now — Ibn Baz's instruction is to renew a sincere repentance and to guard the five prayers in their times.
Further reading
- Ibn al-Qayyim, Kitab al-Salah wa Hukm Tarikiha
- al-Albani, Hukm Tarik al-Salah
- Ibn Baz, Majmu' Fatawa wa Maqalat Mutanawwi'ah
And Allah knows best.
This is a guide to what the scholars have said, not a fatwa. For your own situation, ask a qualified scholar who can hear the details.